Race was not a factor in Gandhi’s strategy. Nationalism was. If you know something about the life of Gandhi, or about India, race is not a key issue. Ideology is always the issue.
Ron Paul seems to think that Gandhi’s approach is relevant. I tend to agree, it was used as recently as the 1960s in America by Dr. Martin Luther King.
(These were appeals to authority, although I would like to see you denounce RP. It would prove a point for me.)
Keep scratching at the post, it is the only way to sharpen your claws. Your wit however is something that has to be cultivated separately. [:)]
There is no need for a revolt whatsoever All people have to do is talk, share info and approach many represenatives with the info at the same time and demand answers in writing.
My name is David Raymond Amos Feel free to google me I can be reached at 506 756 8687 I will share everything about what i can prove to be true byway of the Internet and the phone
Can you and I talk on the phone?
No.
Well then here are some of my documents to study and think about. Please notice byway of the dates and their signature something big happened between me and the the SEC, the DHS and the Attorney General of New York Spitzer in November of 2003
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
Then please notice that the transcripts and the webcasts of the Hearing I inspired in the US Senate Banking Comittee on novenmber 18th and 20th 2003 have evaporated from the public record. Then ask yourself why I am not worth talking to.
Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding
the
Mutual Fund Industry
Tuesday, November 18, 2003
10:00 AM
538 Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 538The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the first in a
series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”Witnesses
Panel 1
Mr. William H. Donaldson [view testimony]
Chairman
Securities and Exchange Commission
Panel 2
Mr. Matthew P. Fink [view testimony]
President
Investment Company Institute
Mr. Marc Lackritz [view testimony]
President
Securities Industry AssociationReview of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding
the
Mutual Fund Industry
Thursday, November 20, 2003
02:00 PM
538 Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 538[view archive webcast]
The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”Witnesses
Panel 1
Mr. Robert Glauber [view testimony]
Chairman and CEO
National Association of Securities Dealers
Mr. Stephen M. Cutler [view testimony]
Director - Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
Eliot Spitzer [view testimony]
Attorney General
State of New York
Anyone notice Robert Glauber??? He was one of Bernie Madoff’s good buddies.
I am also the whistleblower who caused madoff to plead guilty so suddenly on March 10th.
here is your proof.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: “Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)” <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400
Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE SDNY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, USANYS-MADOFF
<USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov>, “Litt, Marc (USANYS)”
<Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, vasilescua@sec.gov,
friedmani@sec.gov,
krishnamurthyp@sec.govThank you for your response.
Wendy Olsen
Victim Witness Coordinator-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE SDNYMs Olsen
Thank you for keeping me informed.
Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
make certain that the US Attorny’s office finally practices full
disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the
Rule
of Law within a purported democracy.As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done
nothing
wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right
to
privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.The people in the US Attorney’s Office and the SEC etc are very
well
aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of
when
the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and
Madoff
pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has
been
trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money
people
are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
beginning over seven years ago..Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
506 756 8687P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards
as
soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web
last
night.http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFullNotice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name?
It
is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes."SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between
Markopolos
and Scannell’s cases as “not a valid comparison.”He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
Scannell reported didn’t violate federal law. Nester said the SEC
only
acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by
some
Putnam insiders.Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn’t surprised the
agency
is in hot water again.Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
investigations. “It’s a distinct disadvantage to make waves before
you
enter the private sector,” Scannell said."— On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
wrote:From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE SDNY
To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, “oig”
<oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, “Dan Fitzgerald” <danf@danf.net>
Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PMNeed I say BULLSHIT?
http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE
SDNY
To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
<jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE SDNY
To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us, MartiK1 <MartiK1@parl.gc.ca>,
“Paul. Harpelle” <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
<jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.govFrom: “Peck,Dave” <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE SDNY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.usI will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
Thank you,
Chief Dave Peck
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE SDNY
To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE SDNY
To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk-----Original Message-----
From: USANYS-MADOFF
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE SDNYIn United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence
from
victims that has been submitted in connection with the case. This
includes your email to the Government. If the correspondence from
victims is unsealed, the victim’s personal identifying information
including name, address, telephone number and email address (to the
extent it was included on the correspondence) will become public.
The
Government must submit a response to the request by NBC and ABC by
Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know whether you consent to
the full disclosure of your correspondence, or whether you wish to
have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy or other
reasons.
If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let
us
know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
can. Thank you.I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for
no
reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
chickenshits.I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?Veritas Vincit
David Raymond AmosFrom: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff
and
KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff
and
KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
To: PChavkin@mintz.com
Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: “Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)” <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.comOn March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from
the
defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years’
imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he
will
conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the
Court
will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court’s intended
ruling.Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
the
Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
counsel
to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce its
intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
individuals
who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The
Court
also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
proceeding.A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
be
found on the website of the United States Attorney’s Office for the
Southern District of New York:-----Original Message-----
From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
Cc: oig
Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
KPMG
etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: “Sartory, Thomas J.” <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.comDear Mr. Amos,
I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for
response.
While it’s not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position
to
help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Sartory
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
reed@hbsslaw.com
Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emailsPerhaps somebody should call me back now. EH? (506 756 8687)
Please don’t take this the wrong way, but I don’t care.
Your post is not at all relevant to the topic except perhaps as an opportunity for you to tell your story.
I suggest you get a blog and blog this, or contact some reporters and see if they want to cover it.
But most people on the internet, don’t usually take the phone numbers of strangers and call them. It’s generally not accepted behaviour any more than asking a stranger walking down the street to come into your house.
Ok, stop that.
I don’t care if you blew the whistle on Madoff. Mises blew the whistle on Socialism.
This is not your private area to dump your email communications.
This community is not here for your aggrandizement.
Hey whomever ye may be
This is a simple stress test of your newfound Integrity
Why did you delete all my words and your responses and block me then repost it all after I protested to your webmaster in front of many other bloggers byway of an email? Are you Mr Tucker himself?
I do not believe in armed revolutions only as a last resort against the evil of longstanding governments. whereas as you are master of disaster in this particular thread I obviously questioned your authority and Integrity. You at least should never deny that I am a very straight shooter. The fact that you advise that I get a blog is incredibly comical. I did suggest that you Google me did I not.
BTW talking to a person with a true name on the phone is defintely not the same as inviting a stranger into one’s home. Your organization has a phone # and invites contact? I did call it BEFORE I am made my first comment and proberly introduced myself and told them what I was about to do. Did I not? As a moderator and therefore a representive of Mises need I say I was not impressed but I am overjoyed to see my words reappear. Thank you for that at least.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
I’m not going to make an international phonecall. but… what would I hear if i dialled ?
I did not know Mises nor did you. However you certainly know who i am as you attack me in a sneaky anon sniper fashion
What kind of strange game are you playing now? I did not post anything after your erased my words and blocked me. When I was notified that my words were reposted I came in to ask a ligitmate question.
As soon as i posted it your response pops up at the same time accusing me of posting more emails? Rest assured Mr Tucker is about to receive more emails from mean old me and I will call his bosses in the morning. You can take that fact to the Federal Reserve Bank and trade it for pure gold.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
You would hear me ask the same questions that I just wrote and Mises published.
FYI I saved this webpage as well.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
You posted a post with several dozen links. The forum automatically moderates posts loaded with links. So then you proceed to make an accusation, not understanding that your post was moderated by the software. Over a dozen moderators get the moderation notifications. Sometimes we aren’t reading email. That doesn’t mean you are being blocked.
That said, you shouldn’t be copy pasting massive gmail conversation threads into posts. Certainly not if any of them have non-disclosure stipulations attached to the correspondence (which iirc all KPMG emails do).
I am in Ontario. The people in the office don’t generally handle day to day moderation of the forum. You should contact the office if you want to promote your information. This is a community forum mostly centered around economics and philosophy. A large number of the members are students.
I suspect it would be pretty paranoid if the posts are any indication.
lol,
“oh my god! somoeone called!?! who are you?!? the fbi?!? aliens?!?”
I suggest you copy paste in plain text before inserting your posts into the forum, and you will not be automatically moderated. If you insist on copy/pasting from the web, then your posts will get moderated more times than not. Calling the office will not solve the problem and driving Jeff up the wall with emails will not solve the problem. Only you can solve the problem.
Read the emails.
If you are truly in Ontario.then you should do your homework before attacking a fellow Canadian that the Yankees tried that extraordinary rendition nonsense on six monthes before I caused those hearings in Novemeber of 2003. . If you are any good at surfing at all you will see that I ran in four elections recently (two federal and two provincial) until your hero Stevey Boy Harper efectively scared every Chartered Accountant away from putting his signature beside mine on the elections forms.
Even if you are not paying attention your webmaster, Mr Tucker no doubt noticed how many Canadian bloggers I sent my email to protesting your actions earlier today. What you explain about the email being posted in such a fashion is likely true. However that does not explain why you deleted ALL the posts and your responses thereto and then reposted them all out of order quite a while later now does it?
Rest assured Jeff will receive several interesting emails from mean old me before I ask to speak to Mises’ lawyers sir. With regards to your nasty friend who does not no how to read. My answer is no I am not the FBI but I am somewhat paranoid. Furthermre you are close I am an Alien in the USA who is a very pissed off Maritimer but still a very proud father of two Yankees and still married to one. That should count for some thing under the US Federal Code Title 28 section 1942 i believe (I quoted that off the top of my head so don’t take that fact to the bank I have been studying Canadain law far too much lately to recall all the US ones as well) That said you do understand i am the layman who enjoys suing politicians, lawyers, judges and US Treasury Agents? If not you really should have checked my work before insulting me on Mises’s behalf. EH kids? Methinks that I am older than Mr Tucker too.
Do you have anymore wise cracks?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Is this creeping out anyone else? It is almost like the apex of Rand’s Egoist man.