when labor was relatively cheap

hello

this link … http://www.perc.org/pdf/ps28.pdf contains an article about market distortions and costs of municipal recycling operations and makes comaparisons to ‘private’ material recycling and reuse.

i found this excerpt of interest… "In a similar vein, 50 years ago, when labor was relatively cheap

compared to materials, goods were built to be repaired, so that the

expensive materials could be used for a longer period of time. As

the price of labor has risen and the cost of materials has fallen, manufacturers

have responded—in the interests of consumers and society—

by building items to be used until they break, and then

discarded. There is no “bias” against recycling; there is merely a

market-driven effort to conserve resources."

firstly, i dont know if this is completely true or not - or if a valid comparison can be made from economics 6 decades ago.

but it seems consistent with some of my readings of julian simons information about declining commodity prices and bets with other doom-economists.

my first thought though ; has the price of labor risen against the cost of materials or stayed nearly the same amidst falling material costs? is their a distinction? i am not sure.

additionally, the excerpt "manufacturers

have responded—in the interests of consumers and society—

by building items to be used until they break, and then

discarded…" would cheaper-to-repair-and upgrade have been just as much of interest to society? was this attempted?

the logic of that claim seems unclear to me.

what i would also like to know however is would a market money or commodity money provide a different outcome than the alleged “falling price of materials and rising labor costs” mentioned above.

do labor costs rise as a natural function of additional ‘material consumerizing’? iow, making raw materials more fashinable for consumers through refining stages?

i have read that many at mises.org seem to bemoan the price increasing effects of monetary inflation.

if prices of materials have declined faster than labor prices as in the article - did this occur under government managed currency?

did the falling prices of materials decline in spite of the government managed currency?

would private money generation, commodity money – work in the same way that private recycling seems to… in a much more beneficial manner than municipal recycling operations?

input and clarification would be appreciated

Increasing capitalization pushes wages up and increases the scarcity of labour vis-a-vis capital, so it’s hardly an implausible view. But I would caution against taking current labour prices as representative of what’d prevail under market conditions, due to minimum wage laws, labour regulations, state-assisted unions &c.