Yeah, I stumbled on this one on the Web a long, long time ago, just by chance.
Clayton -
LMFAO
How can anybody take this crap seriously? Never argue with a fool. People won’t be able to tell the difference.
Dave-- for once, we agree on something. 
Sorry, of course I meant grandson. (I bet you don’t make mistakes, because you only speak only one language, English)
About the others posts, I have never written about 1, 2 and 5.
I did ask a poster to prove how he was so certain about events that happened thousands of year ago according to him.
I pointed to him, that it is a proven fact that the unified timeline of history we use today was organized in the XVIII century by Scaliger and Petavius and that great and complicated achievement has been criticized by many historians, librarians, men of letters, scientists, including Newton and for many centuries. I pointed some names so those interested could find more information, I gave the names of Anatoly Fomenko who has compiled several volumes detailing problems in the official chronology by many scientific methods, including studying the eclipses in ancient texts that proves those text are medieval.
I’m ashamed that between clever people who realized how the state lies about everything, very few show interest in such a discovery.
It’s not my fault that we are over-whelmed by conspiracies, the books I posted;
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30389283/Anatoly-Timofeevich-Fomenko-History-Fiction-or-Science-vol-I
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32636139/Anatoly-Timofeevich-Fomenko-History-Fiction-or-Science-Vol-II
Are scientifically sounded and only associated to a math professor who discovered eclipses in “ancient books” only have solutions in medieval time and has been digging for 30 years now, reviving many authors of previous centuries who had been saying the exact thing.
You say that austrian economics has been right all long, which I agree.
I can say that new-chronology has been right all along, and censored, but with time will be proven and accepted and the miscalculation, misdating, phantom-copying of the same event twice an the historical inaccuracies or lies created for political benefit at that time will be shown as that, errors (logically made at that time) or manipulations for the benefit of the ruling at that time.
You can go back to my posts where I posted many links to ancient documents scanned and now on-line by many ancient authors who prove what I say.
I fail to see what reason you can have to go angry at me for bringing this information. I really don’t see the bitterness and hostility many show, the close-minded attitude and joking instead of, hum.. interesting, let me take a look, well I’m too busy right now, but I never thought about that before. You just jumped as if I had insulted you. You can claim the official version about Lincoln is wrong, but I can not claim the official version of ancient history, previous to the middle ages is wrong?
I share information that could be interesting and you scream like mad dogs, don’t shoot your anger at me.
To whom was this directed? I’m pretty sure there are quite a few people on here who don’t speak English as their first language.
I’m no partisan for orthodox history (it’s got lots of problems) but “New Chronology” is fraught with data-mining and other basic scientific errors.
Clayton -