when people deal with apples say,peoples underlying view of themselves or social group would really be threatened .(people are happy and used to in trusting tradesmen with having a greater understanding of their trade).when i feel safe mistrusting someones or a groups conclusion would first be seeing if they have they used such ideas to place themselves above the majority of people.and second do they apply critical thinking methods evenly for and against their belief being true.if they spend 20 hours watching conspiracy doco then very little research against then they will most probably have a conformation bias.even tho they may have more knowlege on the topic than myself .
Recent text I sent my somewhat statist, yet very iconoclastic friend after learning that Neil Armstrong died, and everyone in America was calling him a hero:
“I’ve been thinking…why, exactly, is Neil Armstrong a hero? He ventured out onto a moon (allegedly), spending billions in tax payer dollars while he did it, and ultimately gained absolutely nothing for the people in return. And, if you really think about it, Armstrong was essentially the face of a very expensive, multinational pissing contest between the US and Russia. Some fucking hero…”
I think it would be hard to get an unqualified estimate simply from maths. At some point you have to measure the atmosphere of a body in order to verify your formulas, right?
http://home.tiac.net/~cri/1999/moon.html
this guy says its 2,370 meters per second, thats the speed of a rifle bullet. the math is…really mathy.
that (solar wind) does sound convincing, but then why would mainstream sources report 80,000 molecules per cubic centimeter?
whatever makes you happy broseph. Some of us are happier avoiding the regular injections of biochemical weapons.
You know what is funny?
“whenever a conspiracy like this 911 vaccines come along”
"i find it easy just to demise"
“out of hand.”
hahahahaha res ipsa loquitur
Aristophanes '‘res ipsa loquitur’'why do i have a responsibility to take such claims seriously do i also have to take scientology ,heaven’s gate etc any of my time disproving them. sorry i dont see why i have such duty.
You dont have a duty to disprove anybody but its stupid to run your mouth when youre uninformed, as you obviously are. You need to educate yourself on a given topic in order to discover whether its ridiculous bullshit or not.
'Some of us are happier avoiding the regular injections of biochemical weapons’this is why it so easy to dismiss people with such grandiose claims.any argument against the reasoning behind such beliefs will be meet with some kind of personal attack . it just couldn’t be you in the wrong could it i bet you have never considered that as a possibility. bill clinton couldn’t keep his blow job secrete and you mean to tell me such people can pull off such lies.sorry i dont give government such credit.
Its not a secret, bill gates told everybody vaccines are for population control. Thats something you might have already known if youd taken the time to read about it. Not a personal attack, just a fact.
'‘but its stupid to run your mouth when you’re uninformed, as you obviously are’'ok again with someone doesn’t agree with me so they must be stupid.nice argument.if i told you binlarden was hidding on the other side of the moon would you realy go try to educate your self in before you dismiss it.
Youre obviously uninformed, so youre obviously uninformed. I didnt say you were stupid but you were acting stupid when you made…basically all of your posts in this thread. Yes, I would probably try to figure out who “binlarden” was, and what “hidding” meant, then try to find out who had performed lunar reconnaissance in the significantly recent past (time frame based on who “binlarden” is and why I care).
Hey, I have this really outlandish claim that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a fraud. Don’t go look into it. That’s obviously crazy.
‘Not a personal attack’'try to keep it that way calling people stupid even if they are is never going to convince people of your reasoning.
Why would I be trying to convince you? youre not interested in changing your mind.
I was making a joke about your post. You used the word “demise” where you wanted to say “dismiss.”
I know it is weird, but those words have different meanings and the way in which you made your grammar mistake actully reversed the intention of your statement. It made it seem as if you don’t refute the conspiracies because you just die.
You said :
“whenever a conspiracy like this 911 vaccines come along”
"i find it easy just to demise" - demise means to die.
“out of hand.” - This is just icing because it implies that your death is out of your hands…
You said(I’ll add your unspoken punctuation for you) , “Whenever a conspiracy like this, 911 & vaccines, come along, I find it easy just to demise; out of hand.”
given the context I thought it was hilarious.
So, I guess not res ipsa loquitur. res ipsa non loquitur…
your right im not interested in giving such topics my time.i said convince people not convince me.id love to here your logic on how calling people stupid is for the greater good.
Truth in advertising.
Aristophanes.yea my grammars shit.its not my fault i got educated to the worlds first state high school.
**
Yes, it is.
What was the world’s first state? Liquid? Persia? Probably gaseous, but maybe Atlantis/Lemuria did have some kind of government!
They still have a high school?!!?
Plasma Atlantis High School - “Gooooooo PAHS!”
=D
Moon landing?
More like frickin’ Nevada!