Yet another anarchy does not work

http://josephbales.com/writings/college/why-anarchy-will-not-work/

that should win some kind of stupid prize.

which one?

http://www.stupidprize.com/?name=Joseph+Bales

Wow, this is embarrassing. I’m guessing he’s never actually read anything about anarchism, or political philosophy, or economics?

“Leaders have always been an important part of any society, and not just human society.”

His fallacy is associating anarchy, the absence of rulers, with the absence of leaders. Leaders and administrators are compatible with anarchy.

“Even the dumbest of herbivores have an instinct to listen to their leaders for the good of the rest of the herd.”

I lol’ed. Has he never heard of spontaneous order? I guess these birds and fishies can’t survive without a central planning board.

I read to the word used by non-economists: Hoarding. I say this because people without force applied to them will trade stuff they have for stuff they want. Hoarding is the product of government force. If I hoard food, it is not because the economy can not make more of it, it is because the government has stepped into legitimate transactions and forced one party to supply the good when the property owner could get a higher price for it without the force.

Also, the world is not running out of space or food. There is plenty of both. I am amazed that people in the US would feel that these things are as limited as they are. I should not be as most of the educational bureaucracy teaches that the US is running out of landfill space.

I think I’ve just lost ten I.Q points after reading that crappy essay…

It seems like he hasn’t even thought about the possibility that people trade with each other. In his example of there being food shortages he says

": Food will be the first to go. Those who have food will hoard it and those without it will be forced into desperate measures to obtain it. This will begin the breakdown of any sort of peace that might be prevailing in the beginning. Farms will immediately be looted**. Even if the farmer is successful in protecting what he has, he will have to devote so much time and effort to maintaining security for his farm that he will not have time to do the actual farming"**

Has it not occured to him that the Farmer could hire someone to protect his farm in exchange for food?

Even better:

http://www.stupidprize.com/?name=Ben+Bernake

http://www.stupidprize.com/?name=Karl+Marx