This really has nothing to do with libertarianism, but as a so-called “Polish-American,” I am constantly annoyed by the use of German WWII-era propaganda in our history textbooks regarding a mythical “cavalry charge” against tanks. Just as history textbooks constantly get the cause of the Great Depression and the stock market bubble of the late 20s wrong, they constantly seem to absorb everything that is untrue.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Krojanty :
The 18th Pomeranian Uhlans spotted a group of German infantry resting in a clearing in the Tuchola Forest heath near the railroad crossroads of Chojnice - Runowo Pomorskie line .
Colonel Kazimierz Mastalerz decided to take the enemy by surprise and ordered Eugeniusz Świeściak, commander of the 1st squadron, to execute a cavalry charge at 1900 hours, leading two squadrons, about 250 strong. Most of the two other squadrons, and their TKS /TK-3 tankettes , were held back in reserve.
The charge was successful: the German infantry unit was dispersed, and the Poles occupied the clearing. However German armored reconnaissance vehicles appeared from the forest road, probably part of Aufklärungs-Abteilung 20 , and soon the Polish units came under heavy machine gun fire, probably from Leichter Panzerspähwagen equipped with MG 34 , or Schwerer Panzerspähwagen equipped also with a 20 mm gun. The Poles were completely exposed and began to gallop for cover behind a nearby hillock.[3]
Commander Świeściak was killed, as was Mastalerz, who tried to save him. About a third of the Polish force was dead or wounded. On the other hand, the German advance was halted long enough to allow the withdrawal of Polish 1st Rifle battalion and National Defence battalion Czersk from the nearby battle of Chojnice .
The Polish cavalry charge impressed the Germans and caused a delay in the offensive of the German 20th Motorised Infantry Division which considered a tactical retreat. This was however prevented by personal intervention of Gen. Guderian, who in his memoirs stated that he encountered his staff wearing helmets, preparing an anti-tank gun for a possible Polish cavalry attack [4] the panic of the first day of war was overcome quickly .[5]
Also:
The Polish cavalry charge stopped the German pursuit for the day, and the units of Czersk Operational Group were able to withdraw southwards unopposed. Also, it took the enemy several hours to reorganise and continue the advance. On September 2 , 1939 , the 18th Pomeranian Uhlans Regiment was decorated by Gen. Grzmot-Skotnicki , the commander of the Operational Group, with his own Virtuti Militari medal for valour shown in this combat.
The same day, German war correspondents were brought to the battlefield, together with two journalists from Italy . They were shown the corpses of Polish cavalrymen and their horses, as well as German tanks that had arrived at the place after the battle. One of the Italian correspondents, Indro Montanelli , sent home an article, in which he described the bravery and heroism of Polish soldiers, who charged German tanks with sabres and lances. Although such a charge did not happen and there were no tanks used during the combat, the myth was used by German propaganda during the war. German propaganda magazine Die Wehrmacht reported on 13 September that the Poles had gravely underestimated German weapons, as Polish propaganda had suggested that German armored vehicles were only covered with sheet metal, leading to a grotesque attack. After the end of World War II it was still used by Soviet propaganda as an example of stupidity of pre-war Polish commanders, who allegedly did not prepare their country for the war and instead wasted the blood of their soldiers.
George Parada states:[6]
Contrary to German propaganda, Polish cavalry brigades never charged tanks with their sabres or lances as they were equipped with anti-tank weapons such as 37 mm Bofors wz.36 (exported to UK as Ordnance Q.F. 37 mm Mk Iarmour at 600 m at 30 degrees. The cavalry brigades were in the process of being reorganized into motorized brigades.
Another weapon was anti-tank rifle model 1935 (karabin przeciwpancerny wz. 35 ). Its calibre was 7.92 mm and it could penetrate 15 mm of armour at 300 m at 30 degrees. In 1939, the Germans were mainly equipped with the small Panzer I and Panzer II models which were vulnerable to such weapons.
Just some more myths to annoy your history teacher with.
Interesting, I’ve heard the cavalry story a number of times as well (in a German public school, mind you [:)] ). Thanks for sharing, kaju.
The question is, are historians in general just too occupied to research this properly or why is the myth being perpetuated?
I think most historians are just intellectually lazy and blinded by their own ideological beliefs. There are just too many MAJOR errors to justify in any way - i.e. FDR as savior, Hoover as laissez faire, Hitler as Germany’s economic savior, Lincoln as liberty lover, Constitution as “living,” etc.
BTW, the most ironic thing is that the French, who helped perpetuate the myth, used a cavalry charge against German armor in the Ardennes.