This is an extremely important film. The trailer is viewable here. You can view the full film through June 13, June 20 2011…
Full film:
wow
Incredible story.
I have so far watched half of the film, and I am very amazed…!
quick google search picked up some info.
Probably should read it with the documentary.
And Ron Paul doesn’t have a Ph.D. in economics so he is not credible.
That doesn’t seem to be the complaint.
The $300m question: what is the point of this video?
well, for one, to show how the State hates competition. This guy spent time and money trying to defend his work simply because his treatment was far better than the State supported treatment… This guy should have been praised for creating a treatment that was more effective than the rest… yet, the State wanted to put him in prison
looks like propaganda film… 
This only confirms what I have suspected for a long time. That the FDA and the Cancer industry are not interested in a cure, they are only interested in selling their services and making money.
I have lost an aunt to cancer and it makes me sick to find out that he discovered this in the 70s and it has taken 30-40 years for people to find out about it.
there is no grand conspiracy, pal. Just self-interest and money money money. And also control freaks, trying to “fix the economy”.
I never suspected that there was a grand conspiracy, only individuals and organisations that seek to profit off of the suffering and misery of other individuals.
You know what this means ?
I can start smoking cigarettes again…
Yeah after reading that link provided by John Ess, I’m a bit more skeptical. There seems to be a lot of questions about the statistical validity of the clinical trials presented in the documentary, it’s not just the vauge claims about whether he actually had a PhD or not. Not proof that the treatment doesn’t work, but it’s difficult to say whether it’s actually his treatment that’s causing the cancers to go into remission, and not some other factor. I’m no medical expert though so who knows.
If I’m not mistaken, Mises.org is described as a “right wing hate group” by the SPLC.
Could it possibly be that the the first half baked criticism from a known shill for the establishment one picks up on google, may indeed, mean absolutely nothing?
Anyways, great documentary.
It was a joke question. This whole bag of hoopla is about one thing. Drumming up support to bump him ahead of the many other monkeys waiting in the banana grant line. Not to mention his patent grinding. Of course, the relevance of this to our interest in a cancer cure is dependent on the validity of his claims, which is to no extent established by this tiresome collection of stories marketed to Joe Dolt. (I dragged the time bar along to find something of technical value and didn’t find it.)
From the Quack Watch link the pertinent point is honesty, not whether he is qualified.
Quacks usually don’t fight (and persistently) win court battles with an infinitely more powerful govrenment for 30 years non-stop. Amazing documentary. Also, a super-natural persistence and stamina on the part of the doctor – a trait of a true believer in his work. Seems to me he’s not looking for anything more than to be left to do his work and help his patients in peace.
Great point Z !!!
Fact 1 - Every 57 seconds, one person dies from cancer.
Fact 2 - Every day 1,500 people die from cancer.
Fact 3 - In any given year, one in four deaths is cancer-related.
Fact 4 - In a lifetime, one in two males will get cancer and one in three females will get cancer.
Fact 5 - Approximately 10.5 million people living in the U.S. today have a history of cancer.
Fact 6 - The relative 5-year survival rate for all cancer is 66%.
Fact 7 - The overall costs for cancer is $206.3 billion - $78.2 billion direct medical costs and128.1 billion indirect costs (mortality and morbidity).
Fact 8 - Estimated cancer cases and deaths in your area.
To estimate the number of people who will eventually develop cancer –
Take your area population times a factor of .4156.
To estimate the number of people who will eventually die from cancer –
Take your area population times a factor of .2110
The cancer soceity have no interest in curing the cancer,there is no money in that. You do not kill the goose that lays the golden egg.
1 in 2 men Will Get Cancer (50%) in their lifetimes. 1 in 3 women.!!!
If you do not believe it is a grand conspiracy than you are ignorant.
keep laughing Than look into which treatment you would prefer, Radiation or surgery? There are many other cures available. They are just not legal in the U.S. WHY???
Their is over 14 cures for cancer,none of which are slash ,cut and burn. George Gordon covers them. One happens to be raw milk.
Consider the quotes from the below link.>
http://green-agenda.com/index.html
Must watch video>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VlhzDLYjzM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VlhzDLYjzM
Why would some rich elite spend $,$$$,$$$ on the georgia guidestones?
I would put my all money on surgery and radiation which are proven to work, while alternative treatments… kinda suck.
But if I was desperate, sure, I would try everything, but then if I was cured, where to put the credit for? Alternative treatment or modern medicine? Just because you got “cured” after trying 100 treatments (including SURGERY and RADIATION) and only after applying homepathic sugar you got magically cured, that doesn’t mean that it’s homeopathic remedy’s “fault”.
And that’s where most anecdotal evidence come from. From people, who tried everything and only in the end cancer got into remission by accident after applying some alternative treatment.
Sorry my engrish once again.
Being wrong is not a crime in the criminal code. Neither is failing to comply with the FDA. The only real power they have is scaring people with scary letters and making the public believe that what they certify is good. The only real threat he ever faced was losing his medical license. You could sell Quacksalve™ and defeat the FDA in a court case.
The strongest case that I’ve seen against his legitimacy is his own video. They go and on about how he did everything he could to stop NCI from repeating his experiments. Last I checked repeating an experiment using the original method is what you do to review someone’s claims. He then somehow tries to warp this into an argument that NCI and Michael Green are evil and out to get him because they used a smaller dosage than he tried to bully them into using. People here just lap up his side of the story and 100% meaningless anecdotes and self-citations at face value.
No one is lapping up anyone’s side. It’s the nature of the “sides” that matters. To me, the documentary clearly exposes the perversions reached in a system of monopoly parasitic “reviewers”, “accusers”, and “approvers” in collusion with corporations arranging reality to their benefit at the point of a gun. Quack or no quack, the doctor should be left to be judged by the market alone, especially since there hasn’t existed even a hint of tort against anyone over the 30 years he’s been in practice.