Financing police, army and courts

well, of course its a dynamic system and there are no guarantees in life but so what?

if there were none or very few hungry people over a long time, farmers would lose their jobs. And then the system would be vulnerable to famine.

is this a serious objection?

Lol, that’s unfair. People will always need food. People will not necessarily always be criminal. Most crime in society is committed by a smaller group of people. These criminals coulld agree to keep a low profile for a year or two, and then strike back when the system was more vulnerable.

people wont necessarily be criminal, but they may suspect each other of being criminals, they might have misunderstandings which they find hard to judge whether they are criminal or not. they might need a judge.

But would there be anything to do for the judges in “times of peace”?

Golf.

Tennis? [:P]

Lol. But they wouldn’t make money!

Are you kidding? Do you see how much Tiger Woods makes?

I bet Tiger Woods has spent more time on the golf course than drowning in in law books.

Doesn’t matter. It’s a pretty accurate label, especially for people in this site. There’s also tory anarchism. I didn’t invent that one.

If you are referring to political ‘natural elites’ maybe you should use the proper name - it’s not natural elites - it’s oligarchy. And oligarchy has no place in a free society. In a free society there is no arch-anything. No mon-archy, olig-archy, etc.

if i said that people with iq’s above 70 form a natural elite when considered alongside those with lower scores, aside from having low standards for elitism would i be wrong, evil, unlibertarian ?

im not saying it, im just wondering about if i said it…

What if you said it ? I can also say lots of things which don’t make sense.

And your non-point is ?

1znaqv9.gif

in what sense of the word sense did the hyopthetical not make (sense) ?

sense!

But see, I wasn’t…hence the term ‘natural elites’…

Really ? Kings and natural elites were mentioned in the same sentence. I think I can safely assume your ‘natural elites’ are political in nature. But if not, please enlighten me as to what ‘natural elites’ are ? Do they grow on trees ? Is that the reason you call them ‘natural’ ? And in what way are members of the elites superior to lesser mortals ?

Superior intelligence, skills, health, etc.