Game Theory, self interest, and praxeology

Sun. 12/08/12 21:44 EDT
.post #235
[url=Game Theory, self interest, and praxeology - #35 by zefreak]

I would say that Szasz’s preference is to regard persons as having free will. I don’t know what “contra-causal” will is.

Thomas Szasz on Freedom and Psychotherapy

The idea Szasz is trying to impart here is that if people have free will, then they have it whether we approve or disapprove of their behavior. Suggesting that free will “disappears” when we disapprove of someone’s behavior is silly and inconsistent - yet, this is essentially what psychiatrists suggest, at least implicitly.

See here.

Are you saying that “behavioral abnormality” (“mental disorder”) is associated with “brain abnormality,” or identical to “brain abnormality”? I can’t opine on whether Szasz (dis)agrees with you until I understand what you are saying.

Also, what is a “brain abnormality”?
Do you mean brain damage, or “something else”?
If the latter, how is this defined? How is it measured? By whom?

Edit:

As an example, ingesting LSD might result in what could reasonably be called a “brain abnormality” (albeit a temporary one), and the ensuing behavioral changes could reasonably be described as a “behavioral abnormality.”

Would you call an acid trip a “mental disorder”?