Dear fellow Mises members,
Under my consideration ,Marx’s theory “what constitutes a class’ was truely based on finding a reasonable thoery against Free-market capitilism for the state (the powerful and rich crafting a loopback sensitized scenario,like the dipiction of Dog that keeps spinning in circles trying to bite his tail ,with a spraypainted 8 on his side of his chest but he never gains the stimulous feeling of reward). On another aspect of that conception:” You can’t have a state or the state of the art of economics (benefiting only one group of the powerful and rich) contrasted to (‘‘The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but longer effects of any act or policy,it consist in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all group’’) (Henry Hazlitt) when you have a freemarket capitilism exsisting economy -Either or - Posperous flourishing econonmy or war.
My Thesis: “Marx’s undefined conception of defining ‘‘What constitutes class’’ Theoretical is an subliminal message with the intention of proportional inviarable components insidous contrasting coexsistens of preodained proletarius antagonistism of the patricians or plebeians in the bourgeois adam smith. Ignoble ground of exploitation it self.” Kenneth A Nolte