Who are you?
I’m gonna go off on a limb and suggest that attis is “adbox”, no?.
Kaju, you have a much better understanding of these things than I do, would you like me to back off?
Nah, keep on going. I usually post on forums like these for a day or two and that’s it. You learn more by arguing than anything else. And I think I actually might go to school tomorrow so I might not have enough time… lol.
Nathyn? He’s one of the dumbest trolls alive.
A repudiation of the so-called “fact-value” dichotomy, for one…
Well he conceded victory to me, albeit in what could be taken as a ficious tone.
It seems like everyone debating me left…do you guys think I was being pigheaded or unfair? They certainly did not concede the point. Did I win? Lose?
Pigheaded or unfair? The guy is incosistent, dishonest, confused.. I can’t beleive you wasted time arguing with someone lacking the courage or honesty to explicitly hold a position, constantly falling back on mystical existential smoke and mirrors while simultaneously and inconsistently making normative assertions.
If he was being honest he wouldn’t try to justify his position at all. Remember, he explicitly rejected logic and reason! And basically the entire field of Physiological Psychology. Not to mention science, economics, philosophy.. He is obviously unwilling to reconsider or defend his positive rights position and adherence to neo-classical economics. Utterly dishonest.