Alright Jackson, I got a question for you: What defines Prog Rock?
I know what it is when I hear it, or at least I know the difference between Hemispheres & Grace Under Pressure, for instance. But what about ‘The Fountain of Lamneth’ or ‘2112’? And, if you’re familiar with it, what about Metallica’s ‘Master of Puppets’ - there are heaps of key-changes & time-changes on that album, and the title track itself goes for about 9 minutes, with abut 4 distinct parts, from quiet to heavy. Does that qualify, or does it have to meander along like ‘Hemispheres’ does? And if it doesn’t qualify, then does ‘Xanadu’ qualify, and, if so, why? Is it simply that Rush are classified in some quarters as Prog Rock, so everything they do gets labelled such, whereas Metallica are classified Hard Rock, and so nothing they do qualifies as Prog Rock, or what? I dunno? This is not a gee-up - I wanna be educated!
In short, what is the definition of Prog Rock, where do we draw the line, and why?
Armin van Buuren is a genius…have all his albums - SOT '06 is the best, but anything he does is as good as it gets for Trance. And he’s not averse to using guitars, which is a bonus for a Blackmore wannabe like me.
As far as I know, there is no set criteria. If you go to the website Progarchives, you’ll find all sorts of music, from the Residents, to Behold…The Arctopus. There are a few commonalities, use of synths is one, strange meters is another. It’s just music that attempts to push the envelope (or sound like the stuff that pushed the envelope at one point) of rock music, or utilizing the palette of traditional rock music (guitar, bass guitar, drums, keys, vocals). Beyond that, the sky is the limit.