Nevada GOP Caucus

There’s no doubt a story with Storey…

Storey County
100% reporting

M. Romney 28.2% 53
R. Paul 27.7% 52
N. Gingrich 25.5% 48
R. Santorum 18.6% 35

Even though Nevada’s delgates are fully proportional and not apportioned by county winners, this is still a little too coincidental.

Okay, just like New Hampshire, something is up. It’s been at least 6 hours and Clark County is still at 5.8% reporting with no new updates.

Uh…so it’s been at least 24 hours since precincts have been closed…and we still don’t have a full vote count?

http://www.politico.com/2012-election/map/#/President/2012/Primary/NV

It’s been over 24 hours and its still at 89% reporting. WTF?? Dr. Paul is behind Obamney AND Gingrich now. This is weird. In 2008 Dr. Paul came in 2nd in NV. I’d expect him to take 2nd again if not win.

2012 will go down in history as the biggest fraud election in history.

There is a hair chance that Paul might get 2nd.

Thanks for basically retyping what I just said almost an hour before you.

By the way, how come you’re not off in the woods yet? How about those links you owe me!!

Paul campaign is suspecting massive voter fraud. http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-national/paul-camp-cries-fraud-over-nevada-caucus-results

Thanks for basically retyping what I just said almost an hour before you.

I didn’t see you there.

I always suspect that there is fraud. During the last election, I remember watching C-Span and seeing RP votes not being counted. I then went on ronpaulforums and other people had seen it too.

Dealing From the Bottom of the DeckPosted on February 5, 2012 by Lew Rockwell

Last night, when CNN shut down its election coverage after Ron won the Adelson caucus, there was no explanation, just a confusing switch to earlier coverage. We still do not know the results for approximately half the votes in the state. I believe Ron came in a solid second, at least, beating Newt and threatening Rom. And who knows, he might have done better than that. We can be pretty sure there are shenanigans going on, because the MSM is not questioning the unprecedented delay. It reminds me of the Iowa strawpoll, which I believe–with good reason–was won by Ron, and not Bach. I guess we will never know, without some courageous whistleblowers, but the US has a long history of stolen elections. Are we supposed to think the present breed of pols is above such things, when trillions and trillions are at stake?

UPDATE from Scott Weisman:

This is why I’m pretty pretty sure (in addition to the “it” in “in it to win it” being the presidency, not the nomination) that the good doctor is going to go all the way. At worst, he’ll just rally more people to the cause.

UPDATE from Michael Morin:

I lived in Reno, NV for 6 1/2 years, leaving Dec. 29, 2011. Ron Paul stickers and supporters DOMINATE Washoe County. The only other support I ever witnessed was for Obama. I was there in 2008 caucus..there is no way these results could be real. Something is deeply wrong.

The Silver State HeistPosted on February 5, 2012 by Lew Rockwell

GOP pols in Nevada still refuse to explain the outrageous and secretive late count of caucus votes in Clark County, home to Las Vegas. While 71% of precincts in the state were counted last night, that’s only about 50% of the people. Apparently the turnout was the smallest in some time.

'Nevada GOP dealing with “trouble box” of questionable ballots’Posted on February 5, 2012 by Lew Rockwell

Now, whose votes could those possibly be? (Thanks to Brad Funkhouser)

The Nevada Caucus ScandalPosted on February 5, 2012 by Lew Rockwell

Incompetence, as Politico claims? Or something worse, to prevent Ron from trouncing Newt? (Thanks to Brad Funkhouser)

Results now say 92% reporting. Dr. Paul is still behind Newt. WTF is going on???

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/long-lines-complaints-of-election-fraud-plague-special-las-vegas-caucus-for-religious-voters/2012/02/05/gIQALuokqQ_story.html?tid=pm_national_pop

Long lines, complaints of election fraud plague special Las Vegas caucus for religious voters

Can we say “bait and switch headline”?

I can’t believe I wasted my time reading that.

Let’s remember that the results are quite in line with the PPP polling done before this, and that Paul in fact outperformed his poll numbers…

I understand PPP is supposed to be the best in the business, but you read that Examiner chronology and tell me there isn’t something fishy going on.

“Can we say “bait and switch headline”?”

No. It talked about exactly what was in the headline.

Okay, “sensationalism” then.

Anything Fishy in Nevada?

Quite fishy.

More proof of voter fraud in other states.