An interesting article from the Libertarian Alliance blog.
“Orwellian Double Speak For Kafir Ignorance”
To suggest that fictional ishmaelism is libertarian is ridiculous, rather it rejects antinomianism to its dictates and suffers from self indulgent legalism.
Even more greatly unmentioned is that fictional ishmaelism adheres to democracy as a means of supplanting libertarian constitutions with its own political system.
Democracy without libertarianism and restrictions on government is simply tyranny by the majority.
Democracy without libertarianism and restrictions on government is simply tyranny by the majority.
Is liberterianism with democracy and restrictions any different?
What’s “fictional ishmaelism”?
ETA
I did a quick google but mostly what came up was a few ranty internet posts on neo-nazi bulletin boards. Oh, and your own posts here on mises.org.
“The Short Version”
The strong anthropic principle is a tautology which states that the only reason that one exists is because that one is present to attest that they exist.
The meaning of final judgement and a chance at eternal life are metaphors for continuance of one’s introspection and genetic identity through one’s children, and a soul is a metaphor for a sole.
Ishmaelism (qurayshism) is a genetic religion for the preservation of the patriarchal lineage (Y-haploid) of ishmael, where the tenets cultural traditions and city state laws (sharia), as detailed in the qurayn, only apply within hejaz - Surah 106 “Quraysh”.
Universalism of ishmaelism outside of hejaz upon non-lineal descendants of ishmael is debase and termed fictional ishmaelism.
Israelism is a genetic religion for the preservation of the patriarchal lineage (Y-haploid) of isaac, where the tenets cultural traditions and city state laws (613 mitzvah), as detailed in the torah, only apply within israel.
Amongst other things, the longer versions dismiss the term islam as a religion.
Well that clears that up then.
Islam is always painted with a broad brush- you can pick out 5 different Muslims and find that they have completely different beliefs that stem from different schools of thought. As I personally understand it- it is very much in line with libertarian views. All judgement is by God not by man. One can do as he wishes on this earth and compulsion is quite forbidden. There’s hardly a point in discussing this with people who’ve already made up their mind though.
By whom, and why should anyone care what they think?
“Not Your Average Kafir”
** Knot Buying It **
auctionguy10, I have read the qurayn and have done extensive research while debating these issues online, so you may want to shop your ignorance or propaganda about it elsewhere as long as I am attending.
The term islam is not a religion, rather it is orwellian double speak with an etymology that does not mean peace and includes an implicit demand “to submit!”, which premises a master slave paradigm that represents an immature condition for mammon thereby denying alternative reason and individualism in exchange for regimental capitulation to despotic authority of its pretentious moral absolutes.
Fictional ishmaelism asserts universalism for its own legalism and a rejection of such premises was a provocation for jesus’ antinomianism against israelism.
And whether one purports that the legalism of fictional ishmaelism is compulsory or not, its proponents laude democracy with tounge in cheek as they reserve ulterior objectives to establish its well known anti-libertarian and anti-individualism political system through compulsion by the majority.
** Seeds of Arab Imperialism and Hegemony **
Muhammad named Surah 47 after himself and outlayed militancy through a war lord declaration.
47:4 So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah – never will He waste their deeds.
…
47:35 So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.
** A Policy for Iconoclasm **
Persians (iranians) are a humiliated peoples, literally arab’s clowns, who had the reasonable religion of zoroastrianism literally stripped from them by deception and force.
If one wishes to change the political policies of iran, one only need to laugh at their foolishness and admonish them for their ignorance in adherence to an alien genetic religion while encourging them to relight their extinguished fire pits and return valour of identity to its people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Zoroastrians
When asked by Yazdegerd, about the reasons for the unwarranted Arab aggression against Persians, an Arab soldier replied, “Allah commanded us, by the mouth of His Prophet, to extend the dominion of Islam over all nations.” [15]
** Delusions of Grandeur **
48:13 And whoever has not believed in Allah and His Messenger – then indeed, We have prepared for the disbelievers a Blaze.
…
48:28 It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to manifest it over all religion. And sufficient is Allah as Witness.
48:29 Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves.
…
49:2 O you who have believed, do not raise your voices above the voice of the Prophet or be loud to him in speech like the loudness of some of you to others, lest your deeds become worthless while you perceive not.