http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/islam_what_the_west_needs_to_know
Utter crap.
Clayton -
I smell a crypto-fascist.
“Not Playing”
Do either of you have anything other than ad hominem?
“Do either of you have anything other than ad hominem?”
I dunno Monk-Eye. Maybe you could ask your friends at the Stormfront forums. Or shall I call you Gnomon?
“Castigation Of A Few Snide Remarks”
I have posted at stormfront as gnomon, but do not really like that every post is moderated with extensive delay; it is a poor forum for timely discourse.
I am not a supremacist if that is what you are worried about, although I do accept limited domains for distinct, autonomous, self governing, separatist cultures for the purpose of preserving individualism of clads as part of free association.
Such is the basis of the genetic religions of israelism and ishmaelism, where each is bound to the lands of israel and hejaz, respectively.
As for referring to the those at Stormfront as my friends, you may be confusing a common understanding of respect for the sanctity of other’s identity for agreement with a means to an end or, as in the case of complete domination, to the end itself, which is not consistent with my biocentric views.
Indeed, how long does it take to remove recessive genes from an isolated gene pool?
If you cannot accept the premises of fictional ishmaelism and its history of anti-libertarian hegemony as directed in a text that a billion people comically assert to be dictation from an angel; that is simply your problem.
And that is the issue, the text and passages that can be invoked at any time are directly tied to a clear and continued history, even if the excerpts are temporarily, conveniently, mistakingly dismissed for political correctness as unintended sentiments.
I have cited the texts for years before viewing this video and the video revealed a good deal more to me - it is awesome, although it is very lengthy.
“Response to a Nutter”
I really can’t tell if you are barmy but harmless, or a danger to yourself and others. It’s one of them that’s for sure. Just admit it, you’re basically a Nazi aren’t you?
This demonstrates exactly what we see out of Keith Preston and other right-wing nutjobs. If we don’t accept that “free association” means that nazis can beat the shit out of whoever they want in order to keep their little society “pure,” then we’re anti-libertarian. If we can smell nazi bullshit from a mile away, then we’re anti-freedom.
I do not consider this board a comfortable place for me, but if I did, I’d tell you to go back to stormfront.
“Ode To The Brain Washed”
** Free Radicalized **
I am not german, so the meaning behind my being a nazi does not make sense - to me; in addition, the term is an over used blanket cliche meant to villify those who find race mixing questionable.
A staunch reality of nature is that in order to preserve individualism distinctions must be maintained, which means that one must be selective (discriminate) if they wish to see themselves in their offspring and to perpetuate their kindred identity.
Verily, a version of the strong athropic principle states that “One exists because they are present to assert that they exist.”; it is a tautology that does not quibble about its necessities.
A chance at eternal life and final judgement are metaphors for continuance of one’s genetic identity through their offspring and a soul is a metaphor for a sole.
And yet, those who do not propose aggression, rather who seek to provide informed consent for elective choice, have their views quashed and shunned by faux libertarians who, as hypocrites, see free association as a crime.
** Convince Others To Fight Wars For Your Protection **
Here is one of my favorite anecdotes, as family lineage is a foundation for the region, just as patriarchy is the foundation of genetic religion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_Caliphate
"According to tradition, the Umayyad family (also known as the Banu Abd-Shams) and Muhammad both descended from a common ancestor, Abd Manaf ibn Qusai and they are originally from the city of Mecca.
…
Therefore they held to a less universalist conception of Islam than did many of their rivals. As G.R. Hawting has written, “Islam was in fact regarded as the property of the conquering aristocracy.”[14]"
Is it not funny that the shia, such as the iranians, place emphasis that the caliphate must be a kindred male lineal descendant of muhammad while the persians are not lineal descendants of the quraysh for whom the qurayn was written?
The persians are humiliated and defeated clowns of arab cultural hegemony who have had the very exceptional religion of zoroastrianism, the identity of its peoples, stolen, literally and deceptively stripped from them!
** Self Preservation **
It is clear that many have been pawned into defending the historical vagrancy of fictional ishmaelism that is founded upon clear and descriptive text(s) which, without reservation, describe its political, cultural, and absolute intentions for hegemony.
It is strange how reference to the crusades always ignores the fact that non kindred clads were invading europe in order to dominate and control its peoples, while the clear provocation is dispatched as unjustified religious intolerance, especailly by adherents to fictional ishmaelism who have been versed that it was an audacious and irreputable offense against themselves.
** Diver Down **
Fictional ishmaelism has nothing to do with libertarianism and it is ridiculous that the accusations are directed at those who would point it out.
“I am not German, so the meaning behind my being a Nazi does not make sense”
Nazi just means ‘National Socialist’. So no need to be German.
" the term is an over used blanket cliche meant to villify those who find race mixing questionable."
Very true. I take it back, you are not a Nazi in the strict sense. You are however a misguided racialist and possibly even racist.
“A staunch reality of nature is that in order to preserve individualism distinctions must be maintained, which means that one must be selective (discriminate) if they wish to see themselves in their offspring and to perpetuate their kindred identity.”
Nonsense. If your definition of an individual is belonging to an homogeneous group of people that all hold the same genes then you have a very distorted understanding of individuality. Being the same as everyone else makes you individual? Hmm
“It is clear that many have been pawned into defending the historical vagrancy of fictional ishmaelism… […] Fictional ishmaelism has nothing to do with libertarianism and it is ridiculous that the accusations are directed at those who would point it out.”
I’ve no idea who you are referring to here. No-one other than you actually knows what the f*ck “fictional-ishmaelism” is, so I can’t imagine anybody is interested in defending it. You invented the term, which is why it was so easy to figure out that you frequent Stormfront. I.e. you have a track record of plastering the internet with this pseudo-intellectual rubbish, and a quick Google for the term bought up your internet history.
The rest of your post is mostly just a rambling mix of metaphysical claptrap and batshit crazy psycho babble.
“Clear As Day”
https://forum.freecapitalists.org/t/ninth-century-muslim-anarchists/20174
Ishmaelism (qurayshism) is a genetic religion for the preservation of the patriarchal lineage (Y-haploid) of ishmael, where the tenets cultural traditions and city state laws (sharia), as detailed in the qurayn, only apply within hejaz - Surah 106 “Quraysh”.
Universalism of ishmaelism outside of hejaz upon non-lineal descendants of ishmael is debase and termed fictional ishmaelism.
Israelism is a genetic religion for the preservation of the patriarchal lineage (Y-haploid) of isaac, where the tenets cultural traditions and city state laws (613 mitzvah), as detailed in the torah, only apply within israel.
“Giving Each Of Your Posts A Title Does Not Make Them Profound”
You don’t like Muslims. We get it. Now why can’t you just speak plain English?
I agree that fascist or nazi is an over-used term. It detracts from when there are actual nazis, like the people who post long-winded nonsense on stormfront.
“Adept And Not Trivial About Definition”
** Been Using Titles For Years **
There are eleven posts from myself at stormfront.org, with the last one being in 2009, and my opinions were not well accepted - nothing new.
From myself there are: 2265 posts and 8 blogs at debatepolitics.com; 312 posts at politicalforum.com; several thousand posts at arguewitheveryone.com (deprecated website); several thousand posts at hardcorepolitics.com (deprecated website); and there may be other forums but yahoo comments are extensive.
** Midst of Confusion **
Now when one refers to muslims, a term which means “one who submits”, one must specify the rule set or religion to which they submit, else one would have no idea as to the reference, however, out of consideration for the obvious lack of understand on your part, it will be assumed that the reference is to the tenets, cultural traditions, and city state laws of ishmaelism (qurayshism), for the term islam is not a religion.
** Reiteration **
The term islam is not a religion, rather it is orwellian double speak with an etymology that does not mean peace and includes an implicit demand “to submit!”, which premises a master slave paradigm, representing an immature condition for mammon, whereby alternative reason and individualism are rejected in exchange for regimental capitulation to despotic authority under its pretentious moral absolutes.
Fictional ishmaelism asserts universalism for its own legalism; a rejection of similar premises was a provocation for jesus’ antinomianism against israelism.
And whether one pretends that the legalism of fictional ishmaelism is compulsory or not, its proponents laude democracy with tounge in cheek, ambitious for majority implementation as an ulterior objective to establish its well known anti-libertarian and anti-individualism political system.
** Cautionary Tales**
Numbers mean votes and votes mean political policy.
On a personal level many are perhaps polite, congenial, and kind, however through politics many are impersonal, judgemental, and cruel.
One must be madd to expect my complacency for the concrete reality of authoritarianism inherent with the debase ideologies of fictional ishmaelism.
Everytime I come back on here I find less and less to keep me on here, but it’s the random shit like this that I find curiously interesting. It’s like when they bring the jester out when the court is bored.
“Bare Ring of Naked Kings”
You are mistaking the hanged man for the fool.
http://www.free-tarotcardreading.com/tarotcardthehangedman.php
"A simpler but deeper meaning resides in the journey of life. Consider how certain aspects of life - for example sex - are viewed one way by children and a different way by adults. The Hanged Man is the initiate into mysteries. He understands the truth because he sees it from a different angle. The most common interpretation of the card is of an outcast of society that appears to be a fool but is actually in complete alignment. The upside downness of the hanged man gives him an advantage that outsiders are unable to see or understand.
When Key 21 (The World) is placed above The Hanged Man, it makes an ankh, the Egyptian symbol of life, taking us back to The Empress. He represents the deal life made with death; that in return for reproduction, we are mortal."
No, the hanged man (you) is the fool (you). I could care less about your digital tarot cards. I’m not some Slavic gypsy.
I take it all back. You are an unrecognised prophet; a Nietzschean Overman who after having descended from the mountain of isolation is cruely dismissed by us mere mortals as a fruitcake. Lead us into the light oh Great One. Save us from our ignorance. 
Every religion demands that you submit to God/whatever it is they believe in. That’s the whole point of having a religion.
If you don’t like religion, fine, but there’s no reason to single out Muslims for being any crazier or more dishonest than the rest of you.
“Mockery of Non Reason For Fools Feigning Support for Libertarianism”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-L-M
The word إسلام ʾIslām is a verbal noun derived from s-l-m, meaning “submission” (i.e. entrusting one’s wholeness to another), which may be interpreted as humility. “One who submits” is signified by the participle مسلم, Muslim (fem. مسلمة, muslimah).[3]
“One may practice islam in a BDSM dungeon by being a muslim to a dominatrix.” is a correct statement as the etymology of the terms muslim and islam are generic - idioms.
** Cultural Signature - Master Slave Paradigm **
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_slavery
In 2003 a high-level Saudi jurist, Shaykh Saleh Al-Fawzan, issued a fatwa claiming “Slavery is a part of Islam. Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long there is Islam.”[121]
Shaykh Fadhlalla Haeri of Karbala expressed the view in 1993 that the enforcement of servitude can occur but is restricted to war captives and those born of slaves.[123]
Dr. Abdul-Latif Mushtahari, the general supervisor and director of homiletics and guidance at the Azhar University, has said on the subject of justifications for Islamic permission of slavery:[124**]**
“Islam does not prohibit slavery but retains it for two reasons. The first reason is war (whether it is a civil war or a foreign war in which the captive is either killed or enslaved) provided that the war is not between Muslims against each other - it is not acceptable to enslave the violators, or the offenders, if they are Muslims. Only non-Muslim captives may be enslaved or killed. The second reason is the sexual propagation of slaves which would generate more slaves for their owner.”