A wonderful explanation of why the ruling is wrong (why it’s a regulation of commerce and not a tax; why even if it was a tax, it would have to be considered a direct tax and not an indirect tax). Of course, since it is not truly a tax but a regulation of commerce and the court said Congress couldn’t do this as a proper, Constitutional regulation of commerce, it should have been struck down. And if it were somehow a tax, it would certainly be a direct tax, which would require it to be apportioned to the population of the states. Since it is not, it would have to be struck down. I believe this is the guy that wrote The Constitution: What It Actually Said and Meant. Anyway, very interesting podcast. It’s approximately half an hour long.