He also did way better in Iowa. And is polling way better virtually everywhere than he did 4 years ago. That’s my whole point.
It means Paul “doing well” in NH isn’t as hard to do. It means that you don’t have to do as much work (and cover as much ground) to show a significant percentage of the vote. Other than Rhode Island, I dare you to find another proportionally similar state (population/square miles) that couldn’t be easily campaigned. (I only rule out RI because I assume it’s basically Massachusetts.)
You’re.
And here you are, more than a decade in the making. Quite an impact you’ve had.
It’d be a little more convincing if after 10 years you didn’t still have less 5% of your goal of 20,000 people…which itself is only 1.5% of current NH population.