Scott Brown, a failure for the tea party

Miscellaneous Current Events
1

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100413/ts_ynews/ynews_ts1593_4

"Has Scott Brown turned out to be a blessing in disguise for congressional Democrats?

When Scott Brown scored his upset victory in January’s special election to fill Edward Kennedy’s Senate seat, panicked Democratic Party insiders assumed the sky was falling. Brown’s election as the newest senator from Massachusetts meant that the Democrats had lost their razor-thin 60-vote majority to counter GOP filibuster threats on major legislation.

What’s more, the symbolism couldn’t have looked worse for Democrats: Here was the seat held by the Senate’s late liberal lion, in one of the bluest states on the electoral map, falling into the Republican column. Activists from the small-government Tea Party movement had flooded the state with volunteers to get out the vote and claim this critical Senate seat as a prize pick-up for the anti-Democratic, anti-Obama insurgency. Election watchers even started talking about the “Scott Brown effect,” as polling started to look grim for other established liberal lawmakers from traditionally deep blue states, like California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer.

But barely three months into his tenure, Brown has fallen out of favor with his onetime Tea Party backers, and is starting to looking like something of a silver lining for Democrats. In a no-less symbolic moment, Brown declined an invitation to appear at a Tea Party rally in Boston this week headlined by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Brown cited pressing legislative business as the reason for his no-show–but his fledgling legislative record is precisely what has conservative activists so angry at him. On Monday, he furnished a critical swing vote to tamp down a threatened Republican filibuster on a bill to extend federal unemployment benefits. And in his first major break with conservative activists, he voted for a Democratic jobs bill in February, earning him thousands of outraged comments on his Facebook page from Tea Party backers who felt betrayed by the senator they had worked so hard to help elect. Both votes have also helped Senate Democrats make the case that they are hammering together bipartisan support on important legislation — something that’s been an elusive goal in dealing with the filibuster-happy GOP Senate minority.

Even on health care reform — the issue that Brown’s election was supposed to help derail — the big GOP turnaround in Massachusetts created a certain “scared straight” effect among key Democratic congressional leaders. In order to stem the rising tide of conservative discontent, Democrats simply chose to bear down and get the health care legislation passed. And the loss of the 60-vote majority also simplified the decision-making for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other top Senate Democrats going forward. Being forced to adopt the budget-driven tactic of reconciliation to win approval on a 50-plus majority was oddly liberating for Senate leaders who had sweated out no end of unsavory deals to get wavering centrist lawmakers on board for the initial Senate health care vote last December…"

Go tea party! Oh wait, never mind.

2

3

Note to Tea Partiers and other Freedom Oriented Republicans:

The Republicans (Except for Ron Paul) are not going to save you. They are going to continue their philosophy of doing most of things Obama is doing only less so. Keep in mind that Bush expanded Medicare and Medicaid and Chip and other health care programs thus adding trillions to the Federal Liabilities. He has run roughshod over the the First, Fourth, Ninth and Tenth amendments. His dreams of a one world government/police state are equal to if not worse than Obamas.

And I forgot, he and his Republican friends have put us in 2, uh 3, higher, 4, higher 5 active and completely un-winnable wars: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Columbia and the Mexican Border.

4

Scott Brown is from Mass. I don’t know why anyone expected any different from this guy, Mass is not super red like Texas or SC.

5

They all suck, no matter where they are from. The whole idea that we can just vote in the right people is infantile.

6

Ok but the point is that it was unrealistic to expect another Ron Paul to come out of Mass.

7

I don’t think they were hoping for a Ron Paul. That is the problem with the Tea Party. They don’t really seem to know what they want. It’s like the stupid polls that show most people in the United States want lower taxes. Of course, if you actually asked these people what services they would like to cut, my guess is that most of them would not have a clue. I think it is the same thing with the Tea Party people. They want lower taxes, but they don’t know what should be cut, or can’t agree on it, so they really can’t agree on a candidate that stands for anything.

8

I saw a poll yesterday that showed that many of them are in their mid 50s to early 60s and beyond so many of them favor programs like social security and medicare.