Three Cheers for the Destruction and Theft of Private Property in Egypt!

Anti-Mubarak Protests Trigger Looting, Arson Attacks (Video) (Bloomberg)

Looting engulfs Cairo, other Egyptian cities (Bloomberg, January 29, 2011)
Looters rip heads off 2 mummies at Egyptian Museum (Bloomberg, January 29, 2011)
Metro AG Says Both Cairo Stores Looted During Unrest (Bloomberg, January 31, 2011)
Hardee’s restaurants looted, closed in Egypt (Los Angeles Business, February 1, 2011)
Egyptian seed bank looted (Nature, February 1, 2011)

“Would-be looters broke into Cairo’s famed Egyptian Museum, ripping the heads off two mummies and damaging about 10 small artifacts before being caught and detained by army soldiers, Egypt’s antiquities chief said Saturday.”

How dare those statist pigs interfere with the revolution!

I detect sarcasm. Are you saying that the existence of the destruction of private property is a justification for the state?

For some reason I’m still puzzled why people choose to comment on peoples’ situations that have nothing to do with them, particularly when there is obviously a traumatic situation going on. This is why no one should trust an intellectual as far as they can throw them, they turn every real person and action into an Aesop.

3 months ago no one gave a fig about a single person or thing in Egypt (minus the Pyramids), and when bored opportunistic Westerners start caring, I feel sorry for the poor SOB’s under their radar of concern.

This is the trade-off in every revolt. You are setting back investor’s confidence by the turmoil and you expect them to provide more capital in the future due to the allegedly improved freedoms this revolt will bring. It’s an investment which one expects to pay back in time its costs in capital. As many investments, its is very risky. Chile succeeded. In the case of Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen, as I wrote elsewhere in the forum, this investment will end up having a negative net present value. Autocracy is better than democracy, but there’s no point in trying to convince anyone now that the damage has been done.

Obviously not, it is clear the looters should have been allowed to destroy the Egyptian antiquities without interference from statist soldiers. The ReVoLution! seems to be an economic boom for Eygpt,

Businesses stay closed amid fear of looting (Financial Times, January 31, 2011)
BG, Statoil Halt Drilling in Egypt as Unrest Escalates (Bloomberg, January 31, 2011)
Coca-Cola, Cisco Scaling Back in Egypt Amid Protests (Bloomberg, January 31, 2011)
Egypt unrest casts dark cloud on investments (Bloomberg, January 31, 2011)
Egypt’s economy hurt as travelers avoid the unrest (Businessweek, January 31, 2011)
Lafarge Halts Output in Egypt Until Unrest Diminishes (Bloomberg, January 31, 2011)
Nissan Closes Egypt Plant After Political Protests (Bloomberg, January 31, 2011)
P&G closes Egypt plants, office (Bloomberg, January 31, 2011)
UBS Will Temporarily Close Representative Office in Egypt (Bloomberg, January 31, 2011)
Egypt unrest could impact aviation in region (Bloomberg, February 1, 2011)
Egypt Unrest May Drive Up LNG Trading Costs for Asia, Europe (Bloomberg, February 1, 2011)

I am overwhelmed by the number of signs saying,

“اعطني الحرية وسياسة عدم التدخل” (Give me Liberty and Laissez-faire)

Viva La ReVoLution!!!

Are you seriously arguing that the destruction of private property is benefiting the economy?

He’s trying to use the Egyptian riots to say that the state is necessary and anarchy is chaos.

Here’s a story highlighting spontaneous order of property rights protection during the chaos.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ml_egypt_neighborhood_watch

They have Hardee’s in Egypt? And yet they still riot? I guess a people aren’t really free until they have Sonics.

Seems a rather shortsighted point.

On the one hand museums are not private property. On the other hand, any type of big change will lead to expropriation. Even a libertarian one – of any kind. For one because there is so much government property and two: because there is an unsustainable and irrational system of political privilege. Similar to a recession under centralized banking. Hoppe and Rothbard, not to mention many others, have talked about this at length.

To those who are criticizing them for not putting 'go free market capitalism!" on their signs. Do you cheer when little old ladies or black people get tasered by the police if they are not libertarians? Do you cheer the war in Iraq to support imperialism over their own autonomous government? Because they are not libertarians? It seems you have your blinders on. This seems to be driving some people into the type of cynicism that makes Cheneys and Rumsfelds.

Wouldn’t this barrage of links be better suited for RevLeft or another left-leaning site? Libertarians/Liberals are pretty anti-violence and support commerce and private property. (In fact, most would only support violence when its in defense of private property)

They have Hardee’s in Egypt? And yet they still riot? I guess a people aren’t really free until they have Sonics.

I only know of Hardee’s to exist on toll roads, they are surprisingly not bad. I guess I am under a tyranical yoke though due to not having a Sonics, even though I see their commercials all the time. We do have a Chik-Fil-A though, there is some fast food that can bring peace on Earth.

Seriously though, what is the point of this thread? That rioting is dangerous and unprofitable for most, I think most people share that sentiment.

(censored comment by the practitioners of liberty)

What are you talking about? Who is this directed at?

What the heck is this all about? I’m confused.

@ Angurse and William

I moved Poptech’s post to his own thread on the subject. We can keep this as the sarcasm thread, and the other as the non-sarcasm thread.

It is clear Museums should be razed and burned to the ground as antiquity museums are obviously signs of statist imperialism!

Yes of course I ALWAYS cheer when the statist pigs tazer innocent people as that clearly relates to what signs ReVoLutionaries hold. Your direct leap of logical connections is breathtaking to behold.

Daniel Muffinburg, it is nice to see you practicing censorship because you do not approve of the comments. Did you learn this tactic in your statist reeducation camp?

I detect sarcasm. Anyway, since when is moving a post “censorship”? Did I delete you post? Nooo. Is moving a book in a library from the current events section to the humor section considered “censorship”? Btw, when I first the read the post I moved, I thought you had accidentally made the post in the wrong thread; I’d thought you had meant to make the post here.