We are NOT born Libertarian!

Miscellaneous Current Events
1

[b]“I think the problem is actually more insidious than that. In my view, every human is born a libertarian. We don’t even need “cradle-to-grave propaganda” to convince people to be libertarian. They’re born that way. The propaganda is required to sustain the statist quo.”

  • Clayton[/b]

I felt like this needed its own thread.

Okay, look, this whole top-down interpretation of historical progression is inane. It’s popular because it feeds into the same pathology that zeitgeist and alex jones feed into of fear of some controlling, top-down state power, when the reality is that force, tribalism, culture and the ‘state’ are EMERGENT.

The major assumption is that there are “The Powers That Be”(whatever the hell that means) that ‘rig’ the democracy through all of this supposed corporate corruption and/or meddling to somehow guide the socio-political direction of the country.

This is BULLSHIT. Money doesn’t buy elections.

Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the US House:http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/LevittUsingRepeatChallengers1994.pdf

And anyone that comes in here to suggest that people (particularly children) are being ‘brainwashed’ by propaganda established by the ‘elite’ to accept this statism is just stupid. This system was founded for the people, BY THE PEOPLE. It is people bickering at one another, and eating one another, sucking the life out of one another, because that is what they do - they’re humans, it’s innate.

The establishment does indeed represent ‘THE PEOPLE’. It is a giant tribe, and it is completely natural.

If the people want it, then they’ll get it.

We are NOT born Libertarian. We are born human, and as humans, we are tribalistic, violent, and collective thinking.

2

You’re right, my bad. History is unfolding exactly as we are told that it is unfolding. There are no dirty games going on behind the scenes and we are witnessing the End of History.

What I said is not “top-down interpretation” - had you bothered to ask, you would know that. There is no global, Satanic conspiracy. There is no single pyramid.

The phrase comes from the Bible (Romans chapter 13) and is a euphemistic way of describing the stature of our rulers - they just are. Right and wrong has nothing to do with it.

The point is that you don’t need to buy the election if you’ve already bought both candidates. In the case of Presidential elections, I think there is a qualitative difference between the level of shenanigans that go on versus other kinds of elections.

The system = the Claw?

500×276 102 KB

That is ominous.

I’ve never disputed that government is a reflection of human nature. What else could it be? The problem is that it’s bad for society in the same sense that cancer is bad for the body. Sure, both are simply “the unfolding processes of Nature” but that doesn’t mean we cannot distinguish between the situation when a process is unfolding in homeostasis (like a healthy body) or not (like a cancerous body).

Your false assumption is that the government is the only way that human nature can express itself in social organization. This is demonstrably false.

Clayton -

3

TronCat, do not be profane. Thanks!

4

This guy:

… would be a libertarian by any measure, if we could magically time-transport him to the present. That is the human being in his natural habitat… what evolutionary psychologists call the Ancestral Environment.

While we would have a hard time explaining the benefits of specialization and the division-of-labor to him, he would instinctively understand the basic ideas of property rights, homesteading, voluntary exchange, non-aggression and justifiable violence.

Clayton -

5

I never made that assumption. All I am saying is that it is one way that human nature can express itself, and those that pretend like it’s not human nature are stupid.

I believe it will always exist to some degree. It is a symptom of our nature.

6

Yeah, that’s before his tribe reaches a maximum (according to Dunbar’s Number) of about 150 people, and then it’ll begin running into some problems.

7

Then we are in agreement. Now, let’s get down to some good, old-fashioned social criticism.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.”

  • H. L. Mencken

We can lay aside my hankering for conspiracy theories (I just enjoy reading about and hatching my own paranoid conspiracy theories, what can I say?) for now and let’s focus on whether modern government makes sense.

Please, explain to me what problems - not of government origin - were solved by the creation of the EU. The UN. Why should political systems be aggregated more and more? Why should political systems never be disaggregated? What is the sanctity and wisdom of ever-greater scales of government?

Let’s say Alice lives in a commune consisting of 20 people. Let’s say Bob lives in a commune of 2,000 people. Who do you think has greater say in the policies, rules, norms and culture of their commune, Alice or Bob?

Do you think your vote in the city and county elections has more effect on the outcome of those elections or your vote in the Presidential election?

I live in the State of Oregon. To protest Bush’s polices or Obama’s policies, I have to buy plane tickets costing over $1,000 and pay $200/night for a hotel. To protest the policies of my State government, I have to drive an hour’s distance.

So, why do I pay 5x as much in taxes to the Capitol that I can’t afford to protest that I pay to the Capitol that I can afford to protest? Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Shouldn’t my money stay near the economy where I live, where it can help the people around me and where I have some reasonable expectation to actually have a say in how that money gets used?

The current population of the State of Oregon is roughly the population of England in 1800. Now, I understand see the reasoning behind giving people a vote so they can have a say in how things are run, but how does it follow that if the man in England had a vote in 1800, he’d have more say than he had under the King in 1800 so, therefore, I have more say in how things are run by the US government than the man in England had in 1800 under the King? It’s not apples-to-apples because the scale is completely different. Because my voice is drowned out by hundreds of millions of other voices, I have no more say in how things are run in the US government than the average London pauper had in the affairs of England in 1800.

People’s egos are boosted up from the time they are 3 feet tall into thinking they can ‘change the world’ and by the time they are adults, they are just too damn proud to face the fact that they are truly powerless. But it’s a fact all the same.

Clayton -

8

You ask this of me as if you think I am in support of bigger government.

The intention of this thread was to point out that concepts such as violence, tribalism, culture, race, and the state are NOT simply social constructs, or ‘irrational’ (as one bald Canadian philosopher likes to put it), they are biological constructs, and it is how we express our nature. It is the primacy of the gene.

9

we are all conceived with the knoledge of legitmate property rights and homesteading. it’s so innate we have to read it from books or hear it from others.

it’s also so inate libertarians have debates about what legitmate property rights are.

10

I think TC and Clayton are both right: humans are not born with statist instincts (hence they are born libertarian in one sense), but they are born with tribal instincts (hence can easily be persuaded to support states, being extremely large “tribes” - the state is emergent).

The state is a cancer born of our evolutionary maladaptation to tribes of size greater than Dunbar’s number, just as the modern obesity epidemic is partly born of our evolutionary maladaptation to cushy lifestyles, processed food, and perhaps grains and other stuff. The cure in both cases is to note these maladaptations, counteract them, and educate others so that they will want to do the same.

11

Man thinks autonomously. Are you meaning to imply that man has an innate fetish towards what he percieves within his own faculty as a collective will? Because that claim seems wholly unsubstantiated by your post.

Aside from that, this thread could definitely use some No Treason.

12

Man has an innate tendency toward tribalism. Here is my other post on the subject: https://forum.freecapitalists.org/t/tribalism-race-and-anarchy-can-it-all-work/25372/8

13

Collectivist man:

http://imgur.com/AR3DX

14

The people doesnt always agree, so all the people dont get what they want, weventhough they want it.

15

TronCat/MissMapleLeaf, do you really think that (all) libertarians are morally opposed violence per se?

Aside from that, tribes are basically just extended families writ large. But I think a state is more than just a tribe writ large. The core idea of statism seems to be that parents own their offspring. That idea is in no way a necessary part of tribalism.

I think what Clayton is talking about when he says that every human is born a libertarian is that everyone is essentially born believing in freedom - at least for himself. I’m not sure if reciprocity is something inborn, or something learned, or partly both.

16

Who the fuck is ‘MissMapleLeaf’?

And people aren’t born ‘believing in freedom’, they’re born believeing in themselves, and their tribe.

17

Who do you think she is? Oh and didn’t Daniel Muffinberg tell you to not be profane? Maybe I struck a nerve.

Perhaps you’d like to substantiate that. All I’m seeing from you are a ton of bare assertions.

Let me ask you this: what do you think is the difference between “believing in freedom for oneself” and “believing in oneself”?

18

https://forum.freecapitalists.org/t/tribalism-race-and-anarchy-can-it-all-work/25372/8

19

That’s not a substantiation. Try again.

20

Yes it is. Ignore it all you want, but we are tribal. Get over it.