I’m going to make a bold claim.
Everything that comes out of a State funded theoretical physicists mouth is a lie.
In fact, nearly everything that comes out of any State funded scientist’s mouth is a lie.
I’ve spent the past several years doing extensive research on cosmological theory - the nature of the universe. This subject has interested me greatly because of its over-arching spiritual implications. The big question of “why are we here”.
I’m not a particularly religious person, I don’t really believe in any organized modern religion that exists today. I pretty much make up my own religion based on what I learn about the world around me. I feel it’s important to state this because I want those who read this post to understand I am not trying to push science that has been hacked to fit some fundamentalist philosophy. All I care about are the facts.
And the facts will shock you.
I’ve taken the time to put together a post on my blog that details why modern theoretical physics (key word theoretical) is nothing more than a flaming pile of dog poo.
The post is highly technical. I didn’t write it with the average lay person in mind. So I figured I’d throw out a few random facts from the post for discussion and explain them so normal humans can understand them:
Black holes don’t exist. - I know, this is a shocker. Einstein didn’t believe in them and neither did Schwarzschild. In fact, they both published papers that demonstrated black holes to be impossible. Einstein knew his theories better than anyone, and he knew that black holes violated special relativity’s prohibition on infinite point mass particles (a black hole). If something violated special relativity, then it must also violate general relativity. The two theories can not violate each other. The detailed physics of why this is so can be found in the link.
Further, dissident physicists have demonstrated that there are NO solutions to Einstein’s field equations that allow for the existence of more than one black hole per universe. When physicists construct black holes in their models, they are literally creating a fake universe out of numbers on a piece of paper. The paper proof of this was published by McVittie in a journal article for the Observatory. Additionally, physicist Stephen Crothers has done some epic work showing all the reasons why black holes violate Einsteinian relativity.
The evidence against the existence of black holes is truly epic if one takes the time to look for it. It is not just the mathematical physics of black holes that proves them to be fraudulent, but the actual observational data also refutes their existence. Just to look at one example, we see the M87 galaxy shooting out matter at speeds that appear to be moving faster than light. Scientists say this is because there is a black hole in the center of the galaxy shooting out matter, but by the mainstreams own standards, it is utterly impossible for a black hole to shoot matter out at speeds faster than light – not to mention the fact that black holes are supposed to SUCK not BLOW. There are no good solutions to these observations, so physicists have proposed the ad hoc solution that perhaps the galaxy is just at a weird angle to us, so we aren’t really seeing what we are obviously seeing. (by the way, there is a logical explanation for this that does not violate the laws of physics or require black holes).
Some more interesting facts you might find amusing is that all of the comet nuclei that we have directly imaged with space probes have turned out to be made of solid rock. When we look at images of comet nucleus, it is IMPOSSIBLE to tell them apart from asteroids. They look like they are made out of rock, because they ARE made out of rock. Scientists would have us believe they are dirty snowballs, but all the evidence points against this. – sound preposterous? Not if you assume the comet is an electrically charged body. When physicists analyze the comet’s light spectrum, they see a huge amount of ionized hydrogen and oxygen and assume this is water being broken down by sunlight, thus they conclude it must be melting ice causing the comet tail. But an electrical plasma discharge can generate these exact same effects. Of course, in order for a comet to electrically discharge like this we would have to throw out the current theory of stars, because such a plasma discharge would require a solar electric field.
I could literally go on for hours – and hours – and hours pointing out all the problems with the physics and observational evidence that refutes the standard model.
The conclusions I’ve drawn from my research indicate the following:
- There are no black holes
- Stars are not powered internally by hydrogen to helium fusion reactions
- There was no big bang and the universe is not expanding
- Space does not bend
- There are no such things as neutron stars made out of neutronium
- Dark matter doesn’t exist
- Gravitational waves don’t exist
- Multiple dimensions don’t exist
- There is no such thing as a “god” particle
- Dark energy doesn’t exist
- The physics of GPS clocks, and all other relativistic phenomena that can be proven, can be explained using standard steady state physics
- Basically anything that sounds too fantastic to believe probably is.
Watch this video – it will give you a general overview of a theory that I believe to be what is really going on. I have several more videos linked in my blog post that either make interesting philosophical points or present direct evidence that refutes the standard model.
Some of you may have heard of this theory before. It is called Plasma Cosmology. I’m sure someone in here will run to Wiki to get the low down on PC, believe me when I tell you that the entire wiki article is nothing but lies. If you look at the discussion and history, you’ll see there are a handful of statist liars that have put the article on a virtual lock down. Any attempts to edit the article that present real facts result in an immediate ban.
For example, the wiki article states:
“Alfvén’s models do not provide any predictions that can account for any cosmological observations including Hubble’s law, the abundance of light elements, or the existence of the cosmic microwave background.[10]”
Well, here’s a paper that explains a reason for Hubble’s Law in steady state.
Here’s a paper on light element abundance.
Here’s a paper on the CMB.
Etc.. etc.. etc.. – the article is nothing but lies. Those aren’t the only papers on those topics either; there are dozens more on each of them.
The points I make in my blog post and the papers I reference all support the plasma cosmology theory of space.
Take the time to read it over. Even if you don’t understand everything, I think you’ll still get something out of it.
At the very least you’ll see example after example of physicists blowing hundreds of millions of dollars on failed experiments trying to prove space actually bends and that “dark matter” actually exists.